5 People needed to start making cash today

Follow Traderlinkup on Twitter
Showing posts with label Recession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recession. Show all posts

Thursday, August 4, 2011

David Rosenberg: The Recession Is A Virtual Certainty And Here Is How To Trade It

David Rosenberg released an emergency note today, in addition to his traditional morning piece, in which the sole topic is the upcoming recession, which he says is now a "virtual certainty". He also says what Zero Hedge has been saying for month: that 2011 is an identical replica of 2010, but with the provision of modestly higher inflation, which needs decline before QE3 is launched. Sure enough, a major market tumble will fix all that in a few days, and ironically we can't help but continue to wonder whether the Fed is not actively doing all in its power to actually crash the market to about 20% lower which will send practically flatten the treasury curve and give Bernanke full reign to do as he sees fit. However, as long as the BTFD and mean reversion algos kick in every time the market makes a 2% correction, such efforts are doomed, which in turn makes all such dip buying futile. We give the market a few more weeks before it comprehends this. In the meantime, with each passing day in which "nothing happens", the recession within a depression looms closer, and soon it will be inevitable and not all the money printed by Bernanke will do much if anything (except to terminally wound the dollar). In the meantime, for those who wish to prepare for the double dip onset, here is Rosie's checklist of what to do, and what not.

Recession Protection

Moving increasingly to immunize portfolios from the rising prospect of a recession scenario while providing returns that cash, deposits and T-bills just can't rival what we are doing at the investment committee and asset mix level of our firm.

Let me begin by saying I don't think this will be classified as a "double dip" per se since so much time has elapsed since the last downturn. Be that as it may, it is evident that we will be going into another recession — I think at this point it's only a question of whether it has already begun — with the levels of output, employment and income all lower now than they were prior to the last contraction phase.

Plain-vanilla, garden-variety business expansions and contractions that are influenced by the manufacturing inventory cycle tend to have recessions separated between five and 10 years apart. That was certainly the experience that economists came to understand and appreciate in the post-WWII era. But in balance sheet cycles, which involve deleveraging, rising savings rates and asset deflation, recoveries are fragile and susceptible to the smallest of shocks and typically, recessions occur every two to three years. This puts a recession by 2012 squarely in the spotlight.

I have already pegged a U.S. recession as a virtual certainty, and respected economists like Martin Feldstein in recent days stated the odds were 50-50 and Larry Summers is at 1-in-3. I am fairly certain that Paul Krugman is close to where I am on this file. All that said, recession risks are rising and until we receive another positive policy shock from the Fed, these risks will remain acute for some time yet. We are replaying the summer of 2010 but only when the white knights of radical monetary and fiscal stimulus resurfaced did the "double dip" chatter subside and give way towards renewed growth and risk appetite — at least for a few months.

You can still make money for investors without taking undue risk ... and without having to shift into the ultra-safe world of zero percent-yielding cash or one percent GIC rates either.

Hedge funds that really hedge the risk or relative-value strategies that can go short low-quality and high-cyclical equities while going long a basket of high- quality and low-cyclical equities will be a money-maker in this environment. Those that have the capacity to short economically-sensitive stocks that trade at cycle-high P/E multiples may have an advantage in such a weakening macro and market environment.

A focus on hybrids or income-equity portfolios that have low correlations with the direction of the equity market and generate a yield far superior than what you can garner in the Treasury market makes perfect sense.

And if there is anything out there that is remotely close to "recession proof" it is corporate balance sheets and so an emphasis on credit is going to be critical — the idea is to be selective and identify those entities that have a single-A balance sheet but pay out a BBB yield.
We are believers that gold and gold mining stocks will prove to be profitable investments as the economic downturn inevitably prompts more money printing, not just out of the Fed, but other major central banks as well.

Commodities in general, energy and raw food in particular, should be a core position, as they are behaving less cyclically and more as a secular growth theme linked to the rapidly rising incomes in the emerging market economies.

The economy and risk assets typically hit a speed bump in a recession. That much is true, but investment ideas and opportunities within the market can still flourish even in a bear phase or a correction — cash should not have to be an option.

The key is to be positioned appropriately for the part of the business cycle we are on the cusp of entering. In a nutshell, what that means is carefully- constructed investment strategies and portfolios that preserve capital, minimize cyclical exposures, enhance yield and thereby provide for significant risk- adjusted returns—even in a recession. In light of these heightened volatile times, we also realize that this is not necessarily a buy and hold market, and the ability to move into equity markets and take advantage of weakness should also be a part of the strategy

Source: Gluskin Sheff

Average: Your rating: None Average: 4.9 (9 votes)

View the original article here

Las Vegas Suffers a Recession Hangover

By Ben Levisohn

Las Vegas used to suggest playfully that visitors can forget any overindulgence they experienced while in town. Now city officials are urging business executives to remember why they wanted to come in the first place.

In an open letter published in The Wall Street Journal on Feb. 23, Las Vegas fired the first salvo in a new ad campaign that urges business executives to recall the city's nearly 10 million square feet of meeting space, its thousands of hotel rooms, and the 22,000 conventions staged there every year. It's a far cry from the glitz and innuendos that made Sin City America's playground—and a target for politicians everywhere. But will it be enough to revive the city's sagging fortunes?

That's not an academic question. Vegas is suffering more than most U.S. cities, across a broad front. Home prices have been cut in half since their June 2006 peak, according to the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors. Unemployment hit 9.1% in December, well above 7.2% nationally. The city's economy is narrowly focused on gaming, leisure, and consumer spending. So as vacationers pull back, Las Vegas is naturally in the crosshairs.

City officials had hoped that business meetings might pick up some of the slack. Those conventions and smaller meetings accounted for 46,000 jobs last year, nearly 15% of the city's employment base, and had an economic impact of $8.5 billion when all spending was accounted for. But now that a trip to Vegas has become synonymous with wasteful spending in the eyes of many investors and taxpayers—and with more and more businesses worrying about their public image as they queue up for public assistance—corporate visits are suffering as well.

"Pick a topic and Vegas is not doing well," says Mike Helmar, director of industry services for Moody's (MCO) Economy.com.

Reinventing Vegas won't be easy. Spurred by advertising, including the popular "What Happens Here, Stays Here" slogan, Vegas cemented its reputation as a place to misbehave—and to reward boom-time performance. Visitors flocked to the city (39 million in 2007 alone, an 11% increase from 2002), rooms filled up (occupancy hit 90% in 2007, up from 84%), and gaming revenue surged (to $10.8 billion from $7.6 billion, a 42% gain). That growth was reflected in the Vegas area's gross metro product, which grew at a 10% clip from 2001 to 2006, according to the most recent data. It was as if the disastrous earlier attempt to position Vegas as a family-friendly hot spot never happened.

"What Happens Here, Stays Here" reached 70% awareness in January 2005, according to an internal memo from R&R Partners, the agency that created the ad. But in hindsight, that branding effort might have been too successful. In this environment, being viewed as America's playground may be dragging the city down.

Financial-services firms in particular have been avoiding Sin City. Goldman Sachs (GS) and Wells Fargo (WFC) moved meetings from Vegas to San Francisco after comments from President Barack Obama grouped trips to the Strip with banker bonuses. "…You are not going to be able to give out these big bonuses until you pay taxpayers back," Obama said at a Feb. 9 town hall meeting in Elkhart, Ind. "You can't take a trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on the taxpayers' dime."


View the original article here